Elizabeth Day

Representative Matters

• Garrity Power Services v. Samsung. Trial counsel for Garity Power Services in a patent infringement case concerning two-way wireless charging. Case settled favorably on the eve of trial. 
• Wapp Tech Limited Partnership v. Seattle Spinco, Inc., et. al. (E.D. Texas) Represented innovator in mobile application development technology in three-patent case directed against mobile app testing and development products. Won $172.5M verdict. Case settled favorably.  
• Broadband iTV, Inc. v. AT&T Communications, LLC (W.D. Texas) Represented pioneering video on demand and content management technology company in five patent case. Won claim construction on all contested terms. Case settled favorably. 
• Polaris PowerLED Technologies, LLC v. Samsung Electronics Ltd. (E.D. Texas) Represented Polaris PowerLED in a substantial patent infringement case involving automatic brightness control technology implemented in Samsung mobile phones and televisions. The case settled favorably on the eve of jury trial. 
• OpenTV, Inc. v. NFL Enterprises, LLC.  Represented OpenTV in a seven patent case involving verifying PIN codes giving users access to password-restricted websites and applications, methods of inserting content into video streams using time-code indicators, methods of allowing users to interact with videos and a method of connecting multiple video metadata sets, methods of programming software to identify if a computer does not have the right applications to run certain media, methods of combining multiple media data streams into a single broadcast stream and methods of connecting streaming videos with other websites via a link.
• Intellectual Ventures I and Intellectual Ventures II v. Motorola Mobility (District of Delaware and Southern District of Florida) Represented Intellectual Ventures in back to back patent infringement jury trials in Delaware and won both trials. The asserted patents relate to technology in smart phones including sending MMS messages, power allocation and conservation and docking stations. 
• Intellectual Ventures II v. JPMorgan et. al. (Southern District of New York) Represented Intellectual Ventures II in a patent infringement matter against several JPMorgan Chase entities. The asserted patent relates to a cryptographic co-processor for processing RSA or ECC algorithms. 
• Intellectual Ventures II v. Citibank et. al. (Southern District of New York) Represented Intellectual Ventures II in a patent infringement matter against several Citibank entities. The asserted patent relates to a cryptographic co-processor for processing RSA or ECC algorithms. 
• Certain Products Containing Interactive Program Guide and Parental Control Technology (337-TA-845) Represented Complainants Rovi Corporation, Rovi Guides, Inc., Rovi Technologies Corporation, Starsight Telecast, Inc., United Video Properties, Inc. and Index Systems, Inc. against LG, Mitsubishi, NetFlix, Roku and Vizio. The asserted patents related to interactive programming guides and parental controls technology. 
• Certain Products Containing Interactive Program Guide and Parental Control Technology (337-TA-820) Represented Complainants Rovi Corporation, Rovi Guides, Inc., United Video Properties, Inc., Gemstar Development and Index Systems, Inc. against Vizio. The asserted patents related to online programming guides.