Henry Bunsow

Jerry Tice


phone  (650) 318-6774
email   [email protected]
vcard   Download vCard

Jerry Tice is a trial lawyer with a focus on complex patent infringement litigation. Jerry’s practice involves a diverse range of technologies, including telecommunication systems, wireless networking, GPS technology, display hardware and software, power circuitry, video encoding, computer hardware and software, semiconductor technology, and mechanical arts. 

Jerry has substantial experience litigating cases in federal district courts throughout the country, including the Eastern District of Texas, the Western District of Texas, and the District of Delaware. He also has experience representing clients in patent infringement cases before the International Trade Commission (ITC). As a registered patent attorney, Jerry is also experienced in inter partes review proceedings before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) and has prosecuted patents before the United States Patent Office (USPTO). 


  • Juris Doctor, magna cum laude 
    Southern Methodist University, Dedman School of Law 
  • Bachelor of Science, Electrical Engineering, magna cum laude 
    Texas A&M University 

Court & Bar Admissions 

  • Admitted to practice in Texas
  • Registered to practice before the USPTO
    N.D. Texas 
  • E.D. Texas 
  • W.D. Texas 
  • E.D. North Carolina 

Venue Experience

  • C.D. California 
  • N.D. California 
  • Delaware 
  • International Trade Commission
  • E.D. North Carolina
  • E.D. Texas 
  • N.D. Texas 
  • W.D. Texas 
  • USPTO 

Representative Matters

Dell Technologies Inc. v. VideoLabs, Inc.: Represented VideoLabs in defending three video coding-related patents before the PTAB. In response to Videolabs’ arguments, the PTAB denied institution for each patent on the merits, thus defeating Dell’s IPR petitions for each patent.

Google LLC. v. Express Mobile, Inc.: Represented Express Mobile in defending IPR petitions for three web development patents. Secured win at the institution stage with each petition being denied on the merits.

Garrity Power Services v. Samsung: Managed infringement and validity aspects of patent case involving wireless power electronics on behalf of Garrity Power Services. The case settled on the eve of trial.

Vista Peak Ventures, LLC: Managed technical aspect of litigation campaign involving display patents. Asserted a dozen total patents against some of the world’s largest display manufacturers. All cases settled.

Certain Solid State Storage Drives, Stacked Electronics Components, and Products Containing Same: Represented Complainant in an ITC investigation asserting memory patents against Samsung and SK Hynix. Case settled on the eve of the evidentiary hearing.

Cellular Communications Equipment LLC: Represented CCE in asserting cellular technology patents against several leading cellular handset manufacturers. All cases settled.

BDSA Logo Square

Attorneys. Technologists. Trusted Advisors.
© 2021-2023 Bunsow De Mory LLP

Attorney Advertising. Past results are not an indication of future performance.